28 Jan 2015 13:18:59
Keith Watson signed from Dundee Utd till the end of the season, this also happens to be when his contract expires and he's publicaly stated he doesn't want to stay at Utd. Very shrewd bit of business from Stubbs.


1.) 28 Jan 2015
28 Jan 2015 15:45:18
Brilliant business


2.) 28 Jan 2015
28 Jan 2015 16:35:46
Agreed that Watson looks a good acquisition. I'm not sure we should have let Callum Booth go out on loan again, though. Or is there another defender about to come in?


3.) 28 Jan 2015
28 Jan 2015 16:50:50
I've heard another defender may be coming mate look at my post below


4.) 28 Jan 2015
28 Jan 2015 17:18:17
Supposedly Booth has been told he is surplus to requirements and will be moved on. Which strikes me as odd due to the fact he has been playing quite regularly recently.


5.) 28 Jan 2015
28 Jan 2015 20:27:54
I agree, I like Booth and I'm a bit sad to see him shipped out, maybe they see young Crane who just signed a new contract as the next best thing !


6.) 28 Jan 2015
28 Jan 2015 20:38:14
Booth has been culpable over they last few games. Especially against falkirk. He was at fault for 2 of their goals


7.) 29 Jan 2015
28 Jan 2015 22:04:11
I quite liked Booth, but at the same time he has proved frail defensively. He's a squad player and one that I can't see much effect from if he comes off the bench. Hopefully we can make the Watson signing permanent come July.


8.) 29 Jan 2015
When will people stop criticising Booths defendsive abilities and realise he is a left winger! He should only play in defence if there's nobody else available.

It's wrong to be letting him go, considering there's been loads of players we eant rid of in recent years then we want to keep someone and they're being let go of!

How Handling can stay but Booth leave is beyond me. Booth could easily do better in Handlings role.

P.s who is our cover for LB now?


9.) 29 Jan 2015
29 Jan 2015 17:20:29
I agree Booth would be better suited as a left sided wide player, but what use is that in the system we play ? We don't have wide midfielders, we give our full backs free reign in the wide positions. And the fact he cannot defend all but rules him out of a place in the team.


10.) 29 Jan 2015
29 Jan 2015 19:44:12
Lordrog dead right about us not playing wide players, they have all gone, that's AS preferred system and to be honest it seems to be working!


11.) 19 May 2015
19 May 2015 20:19:03
He could have been used as an attacking substitute.

Much better option than Handling. And the way Stanton and Harris have been playing he would be a better option than them too!